Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

Re: [ccp4bb] Simultaneous PHENIX and CCP4 burp

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re: unstable performance of refmac. any suggestions?
From: "Stein, ND (Norman)" n {- dot -} d {- dot -} stein {- at -} DL {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-05-23
Next message:
Subject: Re: Simultaneous PHENIX and CCP4 burp
From: Kevin Cowtan cowtan {- at -} YSBL {- dot -} YORK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-05-23


Subject: Re: Simultaneous PHENIX and CCP4 burp
From: Peter Zwart PHZwart {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV
Date: 2007-05-23

The ccp4 gui has an option that allows one to specify which executable
to run. I allways forget how to get there.

From the phenix gui there is no problem, it uses the absolute path for
executables, and (as far as I know) phaser is invoked from within
python.

Most interesting mmtbx and iotbx commands can be accessed as
phenix.something. We also have things like phenix.solve,
phenix.resolve and phenix.reduce, which setup all the enviromental
variables +etc when you run it.
Furthermore, any executable in phenix can be executed as
phenix.something_XXX
where XXX is a version number. This works for phaser as well.
try
phaser_1.26b
and see what happens.

HTH

Peter







2007/5/23, Frank von Delft :
> Hi, surprisingly I've not seen this question on either BB -- or else nobody
> have both packages installed simultaneously (surely not????)
>
>
>
>
>
> Both ccp4 and phenix have a version of Phaser (v1.3.3 and v2 respectively).
> Each is (?) incompatible with the other's GUI, yet in a simultaneous
> install, only one can be on the PATH.
> a) Are the executables very different? (v1.3.3 and v2.0 for ccp4 and
> phaser respectively.) v2 has an older release date...
> b) How can one fix the path to make both executables available to the
> shell?
> c) The same problem affects mmtbx and cctbx etc.
>
>
> Shouldn't the ccp4 versions maybe get different names?
>
> phx.
>




ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd