Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

[ccp4bb] Re :Re: [ccp4bb] MAD phasing

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re :Re: MAD phasing
From: Ethayathulla Abdulsamath ethaya_aiims {- at -} REDIFFMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-05-21
Next message:
Subject: Re: Offtopic: Alscript question
From: Charlie Bond Charles {- dot -} Bond {- at -} UWA {- dot -} EDU {- dot -} AU
Date: 2009-05-21


Subject: Re :Re: MAD phasing
From: Ethayathulla Abdulsamath ethaya_aiims {- at -} REDIFFMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-05-21

hello peteri tried phenix.autosol. It gave me following results.  but the data
analyses says that my data pseudo translational symmetry, I have pasted it. Do phenix handle pseudotranslation. Need suggestion on thisSolution # 1  BAYES-CC: 15.3 +/- 27.3 Dataset #1   SG: "P 61 2 2"   FOM: 0.4Score type:       SKEW    CORR_RMSRaw scores:        0.04      0.67100x EST OF CC:   18.93     15.24  Refined heavy atom sites (fractional): xyz       0.865      0.471      0.070 xyz       0.099      0.513      0.070 Twinning and intensity statistics summary (acentric data):Statistics independent of twin laws  - <I^2>/<I>^2 : 2.545  - <F>^2/<F^2> : 0.718  - <
E^2-1
>   : 0.852  - <
L
>!
;, <L^2>: 0.530, 0.370       Multivariate Z score L-test: 4.008       The multivariate Z score is a quality measure of the given       spread in intensities. Good to reasonable data are expected       to have a Z score lower than 3.5.       Large values can indicate twinning, but small values do not       necessarily exclude it.Statistics depending on twin laws------------------------------------------------------------------
Operator 
type
R obs.
Britton alpha
H alpha
ML alpha
------------------------------------------------------------------
h,-h-k,-l
   M 
0.032 
0.455        
0.470  
0.478   
------------------------------------------------------------------Patterson analyses&!
nbsp; - Largest peak height   : 61.921   (correspo
nding p value : 1.218e-05)The analyses of the Patterson function reveals a significant off-origin peak that is 61.92 % of the origin peak, indicating pseudo translational symmetry. The chance of finding a peak of this or larger height by random in a structure without pseudo translational symmetry is equal to the 1.2181e-05. The detected tranlational NCS is most likely also responsible for the elevated intensity ratio. See the relevant section of the logfile for more details. The results of the L-test indicate that the intensity statistics Show more centric character than is expected for acentric data. This behavoir might be explained by the presence of the detected pseudo translation.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Thank youEthayathullaOn Thu, 21 May 2009 16:34:28 -0700 Peter Zwart wrote Did you check for twinning? Why don't you try to use phenix.autosol alone? P 2009/5/21 Ethayathulla Abdulsamath : > hello > > !
I am have a MAD dataset collected upto 2.3A but anomalous signal is upto > 3.5A. The dataset is in P6 and based on pointless and absences it is P6122. > Overall Rlin/rsym is (0.07/ 0.06). the overall redundancy is 10. I have two > Se peaks, i used solve/resolve to find those peaks. I used datasets from 3.5 > to 20A to find peaks i got two good peaks of occ (1.4 & 0.92). I did > analyze_solve and refined those peaks. Then i tried resolve to autobuild and > phasing but it didnt work. The r-factor FC vs FP is 0.40 and FOM 0.6, > although the results looks promising i couldnt find proper phasing using > phenix, resolve.autobuild.  i tried phenix.autosol also but it didnt work. > how can i check the peaks are real.  can anybody suggest me how do I proceed > further and what r the mistakes i am doing.. > > Thank you > Ethayathulla > FROM SOLVE >   Site    x     &!
nbsp; y       z    &
nbsp;  occ       B     -- PEAK  HEIGHT -- >     1   0.386   0.986   0.050   1.449  60.000             23.82 >     2   0.623   0.997   0.046   0.921  60.000             22.11 >  Summary of scoring for this solution: >                            -- over many solutions--    -- this solution -- >  Criteria                       MEAN          SD   !
;      VALUE > Z-SCORE >  Pattersons:                  0.129        0.500        0.279        0.299 >  Cross-validation Fourier:     4.83         2.62         41.8         14.1 >  NatFourier CCx100:            3.28         1.24         3.93        0.521 >  Mean figure of meritx100:     0.00         7.16         53.5 !
        7.48 >  Correction
for Z-scores:                                            -10.5 > >  Overall Z-score value:                                               11.9 > > > RESOLVE results > >  CORRECTED OVERALL FIGURE OF MERIT OF PHASING:   0.61           * >  *     ESTIMATED FRACTION OF PHASE INFORMATION FROM PRIOR:  0.39      * >  *     ESTIMATED FRACTION OF PHASE INFORMATION !
FROM MAP:    0.61      * >  *     NOTE: The fraction from prior will be roughly proportional to  * >     Overall average CC:   0.5423778 >  Results of wilson scaling of model Fc to Fo : >  Scale on I to apply to Fc =      1.934 >  B-value to apply to Fc=      1.971 >  Overall R-factor for FC vs FP: 0.404 for       3288 reflections >  Leaving out            1  reflections with FC=0 and correcting R-factor to >   0.4036375 >   from   0.4035717      as only   99.96960     % of the reflections are ok >  Writing overall R-factor   0.4036375      to "resolve.rfactor" >!
> > > > > > > > #####################
############################## > A.S.Ethayathulla,Ph.D. > Department of Biophysics > All India Institute of Medical Sciences > Ansari Nagar > New Delhi-110029 > India. > ################################################### > > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- P.H. Zwart Beamline Scientist Berkeley Center for Structural Biology Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA-94703, USA Cell: 510 289 9246 BCSB: http://bcsb.als.lbl.gov PHENIX: http://www.phenix-online.org CCTBX: http://cctbx.sf.net -----------------------------------------------------------------


###################################################
A.S.Ethayathulla,Ph.D.
Department of Biophysics
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Ansari Nagar
New Delhi-110029
India.
###################################################

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re :Re: MAD phasing
From: Ethayathulla Abdulsamath ethaya_aiims {- at -} REDIFFMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-05-21
Next message:
Subject: Re: Offtopic: Alscript question
From: Charlie Bond Charles {- dot -} Bond {- at -} UWA {- dot -} EDU {- dot -} AU
Date: 2009-05-21



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd