Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

Re: [ccp4bb] solvent mask with refmac

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: precipitation of the protein in crystallisation solution
From: peter hudson peter {- dot -} hudson {- dot -} peter {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-06-02
Next message:
Subject: Beamtime at Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source
From: Marian Szebenyi dms35 {- at -} CORNELL {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2009-06-02


Subject: Re: solvent mask with refmac
From: Clemens Vonrhein vonrhein {- at -} GLOBALPHASING {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-06-02

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:57:59PM -0400, Ed Pozharski wrote:
> I've seen this before in some structures and have verified in those
> cases that correction of the bulk solvent mask fixes the negative
> density.
> ...
> It was quite convincing that it's indeed empty cavities large enough
> to be filled with artifact bulk solvent.

We do that by default in BUSTER now for ~5 years - also with good
experiences (all assuming the data isn't particularly weird at the low
resolution end - as discussed by others).

> In general, my experience was that although the negative density
> disappears, effect on R/Rfree is negligible (less than 0.1%). They seem
> to be cavities made exclusively out of hydrophobic sidechains (i.e.
> carbon-only), but may set of observations is, of course, limited.

We see very rarely an increase in R/Rfree - but this nearly always
points back to very poor data and/or extremely partial models. In the
vast majority it doesn't hurt at all and in a lot of cases it gives
some significant drop in Rfree (0.5%) and/or reduction of Rfree-R
gap. But the nicest thing is: it makes looking at those Fo-Fc maps so
much easier - you don't get distracted by negative difference density
caused by wrong bulks solvent modeling.

Cheers

Clemens

--

***************************************************************
* Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com
*
* Global Phasing Ltd.
* Sheraton House, Castle Park
* Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK
*--------------------------------------------------------------
* BUSTER Development Group (http://www.globalphasing.com)
***************************************************************

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: precipitation of the protein in crystallisation solution
From: peter hudson peter {- dot -} hudson {- dot -} peter {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-06-02
Next message:
Subject: Beamtime at Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source
From: Marian Szebenyi dms35 {- at -} CORNELL {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2009-06-02



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd