Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

Re: [ccp4bb] low UV reading on AKTA prime

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: low UV reading on AKTA prime
From: Matt Colins matt {- dot -} colins2009 {- at -} YAHOO {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-07-01
Next message:
Subject: Re: low UV reading on AKTA prime
From: Patrick Loll pat {- dot -} loll {- at -} DREXEL {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2009-07-01


Subject: Re: low UV reading on AKTA prime
From: Scott Walsh walshs {- at -} UMBI {- dot -} UMD {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2009-07-01

Hi Matt,

Check to make sure the A280 filter is clean.  Ours was filthy.  You might need to replace this (~$350).  We were experiencing the same thing you mentioned and just had the GE technician out today.  Also, make sure the A280 dial is set correctly on the lamp.  Please check the manual for guidance.

Best,

Scott

----- Original Message -----
From: Matt Colins
Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009 4:40 pm
Subject: [ccp4bb] low UV reading on AKTA prime
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

> Hi all,
>
> We recently got low UV reading on our AKTA prime. We contacted
> GE healthcare, but was told that the UV reading on AKTA prime
> should be 20% of the spectrometer reading, because the path
> length of the flow cell of AKTA prime is only 2 mm (20% of the
> pathlength of a spectrometer cuvette).
>
> I am not sure whether that is the case, but we used to get much
> higher UV readings on the same AKTA prime (almost the same as
> the spectrometer reading). The UV reading just keeps dropping
> over time in the past several months.
>
> Here I have two questions. First,  should the UV reading on
> AKTA prime be 20% of the spectrometer reading? Second, what
> could go wrong with our AKTA prime? (I know it is not the lamp,
> because we put in a new lamp and it didn't solve the problem)
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Matt
>
>
>      
>




ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd