| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] heavy atom derivative choice |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: heavy atom derivative choice From: Jacob Keller j-keller2 {- at -} MD {- dot -} NORTHWESTERN {- dot -} EDU Date: 2009-07-15 Xenon/Krypton, anyone? If you have the equipment, might as well try it. I think I have seen the apparatus at some beamlines, although I did hear recently that xenon is ridiculously expensive now. Jacob Keller ******************************************* Jacob Pearson Keller Northwestern University Medical Scientist Training Program Dallos Laboratory F. Searle 1-240 2240 Campus Drive Evanston IL 60208 lab: 847.491.2438 cel: 773.608.9185 email: j-keller2@northwestern.edu ******************************************* ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Jeffrey" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:32 AM Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] heavy atom derivative choice >X Xiong, Cellular & Molecular Medicine wrote: >> My Question is: >> >> Does mercury tends to get into the protein core to denature protein or >> not? > > This is more likely to happen for a small "bare" Hg like Hg2+ in HgCl2 or > Hg(OAc)2 than it is for a large organomercury compound like PCMB, PCMBS > etc so if you were especially concerned about that, start with the latter > compounds. I'd also probably try Me3Pb(OAc) as an alternative to > mercurials. > > Phil Jeffrey > Princeton > CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |