| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] Sigma Cutoff in HKL2000 Data Processing |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: Sigma Cutoff in HKL2000 Data Processing From: "Edward A {- dot -} Berry" BerryE {- at -} UPSTATE {- dot -} EDU Date: 2009-10-22 The default sigma cutoff (in denzo) is -3 and I wouldn't override that without good reason. The cut-off is applied before averaging equivalent reflections (but after adding partials?). If you reject all negative observations of a particular reflection and average the remaining positive observations, you will get an artificially inflated estimate of the intensity. Even if the intensity is negative after averaging, the French&Wilson treatment in truncate will give you a positive F in the end. Apparently there is some information in the negative reflections, i.e. the most likely value of Fobs for a reflection with Iobs= -0.01 sigma is greater than that for a reflection with Iobs=-1.5 sigma. Ed protein.chemist protein.chemist wrote: > What is the Sigma Cutoff that one should use for Data Processing using > HKL2000. > > Is there a minimum or maximum value. > > Also if there is a variation then what all does it depend on. > > Thanks in Advance for your help. > > Mariah > > -- > Mariah Jones > Department of Biochemistry > University of Florida CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |