| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] : MTZ to SHELX question |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: : MTZ to SHELX question From: Eleanor Dodson ccp4 {- at -} YSBL {- dot -} YORK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK Date: 2007-03-05 Truncate does not change intensities, only amplitudes. (Why should it? ) Eleanor The mtzvarious output will have what you want.. h k l I+ -h -k -l I- Nat Echols wrote: > *** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** > *** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk *** > > >> a file containing >> h k l I(+) >> -h -k -l I(-) > > That's what I meant. However, another reply suggested that the > intensities in the MTZ file wouldn't be the same if they'd been run > through TRUNCATE, as these were. I don't know enough about data > processing to understand why. > > It would actually be trivial to convert from the scalepack file to > SHELX format. What I'm more concerned with is this: how do indexing > conventions change between formats? I've done this before in P63 and > P212121 and the reflection list in the MTZ file is not the same as in > the scalepack file. As a result, I have no idea how to synchronize the > Rfree flags. > > thanks, > Nat > > CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |