Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re: unknown density
From: Bernhard Rupp br {- at -} RUPPWEB {- dot -} ORG
Date: 2010-02-03
Next message:
Subject: Re: What is an aceptable spread in ADP values?
From: Pavel Afonine PAfonine {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV
Date: 2010-02-03


Subject: Re: unknown density
From: Roger Rowlett rrowlett {- at -} COLGATE {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2010-02-03




http-equiv="Content-Type">


I agree with many others: this is quite possibly sulfate or phosphate.
If collected at 1.54A the anomalous map should help identify the
presence of sulfur. Sulfate or phosphate may be present at lower than
full occupancy. I would refine everything else you reasonably know in
the model (including water and any other anions, ligands, etc.) and see
if the blob of density sharpens up. Usually a sulfate looks like a
sphere of density, and a sulfate + water may be somewhat elongated. If
the difference map without modeled anion looks reasonable, try a
sulfate of phosphate at 1.0 or 0.5 occupancy to see if the 2Fo-Fc and
Fo-Fc maps still look reasonable. There is plenty of precedent for
sulfate/phosphate binding near Glu and Arg residues. If you have
negative Fo-Fc density when using sulfate at 0.5 occupancy, you may
have no other reasonable choice than to model with water (or nothing at
all), with the acknowledgment that this may not be completely correct,
either.



Cheers.





On 2/3/2010 12:17 PM, Katja Schleider wrote:
type="cite">



style="font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjust: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; -x-system-font: none;"
valign="top">Dear all,



I found some fairly substantial density in the active site of my
protein structure. But I don´t know what it should be. My
crystallisation condition consists of lithium sulfate,
citrate-phosphate and peg1000. The whole lot doesn't make a dashed bit
of sense!  Any suggestions to fill this density with something?

Picture is attached.



Thanks a lot,



Katja







__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden
Schutz gegen Massenmails.

http://mail.yahoo.com

--



Roger S. Rowlett

Professor

Department of Chemistry

Colgate University

13 Oak Drive

Hamilton, NY 13346



tel: (315)-228-7245

ofc: (315)-228-7395

fax: (315)-228-7935

email: rrowlett@colgate.edu






CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re: unknown density
From: Bernhard Rupp br {- at -} RUPPWEB {- dot -} ORG
Date: 2010-02-03
Next message:
Subject: Re: What is an aceptable spread in ADP values?
From: Pavel Afonine PAfonine {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV
Date: 2010-02-03



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd