[ccp4bb] practical limits of MR?

Protein crystallography Programs for crystallography X-ray detectors
Basic tutorials:
Protein Peptide

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 05 March 2007

Previous message:
Subject: Re: MTZ to Shel-X?
From: Tim Fenn fenn {- at -} STANFORD {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-03-05

Next message:
Subject: Re: practical limits of MR?
From: "Santarsiero, Bernard D {- dot -} " bds {- at -} UIC {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-03-05

Subject: practical limits of MR?
From: Nat Echols echols {- at -} UCLINK {- dot -} BERKELEY {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-03-05

I had a debate with a coworker about using MR in desperation and I'm
curious what the most extreme case is where a very different model was
used to solve a structure. This could be highest RMSD, lowest % identity,
or most incomplete model. I'm also curious whether homology modelling has
ever been useful for this. (I'm pretty sure I've come across papers
discussing this last concept.)

thanks,
Nat

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 05 March 2007

Previous message:
Subject: Re: MTZ to Shel-X?
From: Tim Fenn fenn {- at -} STANFORD {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-03-05

Next message:
Subject: Re: practical limits of MR?
From: "Santarsiero, Bernard D {- dot -} " bds {- at -} UIC {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-03-05