Quick navigation:        Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |   
Protein structure
 

Re: [ccp4bb] MTZ format conversion

 

Basic tutorials:
 
 

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 06 March 2007
Previous message:
Subject: Re: weighting term in refmac
From: HKim {- at -} DECODE {- dot -} COM HKim {- at -} DECODE {- dot -} COM
Date: 2007-03-05
Next message:
Subject: Re: practical limits of MR?
From: Eleanor Dodson ccp4 {- at -} YSBL {- dot -} YORK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-03-06


Subject: Re: MTZ format conversion
From: Eleanor Dodson ccp4 {- at -} YSBL {- dot -} YORK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-03-06

This is possible but a bit of a pain.. - you need to make an mtz file,
convert it to the "multi record " format, go through a scala step to
reformat that then you get back to the mtz with
h k l Fmean Dano F+ F- Imean I+ I- all on one line..
I have such a script but it is not part of the Reflection data utilities
- convert to MTZ

It probably should be part of the Convert to MTz GUI
Eleanor

claudine mayer wrote:
> Hello all and Hello Kevin,
>
> I just have by now a probleme concerning this point and especially
> concerning a CNS reflection file with PHASES. The main point is that
> CNS consider Bijvooet as separate reflections (and far away from each
> other in the file) whereas CCP4 uses 1 line for Bijvooet pairs.
> Without considering all the other problems in terms of format, but
> this I guess is only a question of a good script...
>
> Has anybody already think about this problem ?
>
> Cheers,
> Claudine
>
> Kevin Cowtan wrote:
>
>> On a more general note, having looked at mtz2various it looks a lot
>> better than last time I used it, and the problem of keeping I's is a
>> separate issue.
>>
>> But we still get fairly regular format conversion questions on both
>> this and the coot list. From memory, the most common questions
>> concern conversion from CNS format into MTZ. (We've got code to make
>> coot read CNS maps, which may solve this eventually, but it's not in
>> coot yet).
>>
>> Is that correct? Are there any other format conversions which still
>> cause problems?
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>
>

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 06 March 2007
Previous message:
Subject: Re: weighting term in refmac
From: HKim {- at -} DECODE {- dot -} COM HKim {- at -} DECODE {- dot -} COM
Date: 2007-03-05
Next message:
Subject: Re: practical limits of MR?
From: Eleanor Dodson ccp4 {- at -} YSBL {- dot -} YORK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-03-06



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd