| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] practical limits of MR? |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: practical limits of MR? From: Eleanor Dodson ccp4 {- at -} YSBL {- dot -} YORK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK Date: 2007-03-06 Congratulations - That is amazing - did you find both molecules even though they differ? Eleanor William Scott wrote: > > ribozyme structure using only A-form RNA helical fragments and phaser. I'm > trying to find some time to write the paper but the basic idea is sketched > out in the supplementary material to the paper that comes out March 16th > in Science. > > I was fairly stunned that it worked. I was trying to get a low-res mask > to aid in finding 22 Br atoms (which we never used, except to confirm the > trace after the fact). Although there were 2 molecules in the asymmetric > unit, they differ radically and no 2-fold symmetry could be used to help. > > Bill > > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Nat Echols wrote: > > I had a debate with a coworker about using MR in desperation and I'm > curious what the most extreme case is where a very different model was used > to solve a structure. This could be highest RMSD, lowest % identity, or > most incomplete model. I'm also curious whether homology modelling has > ever been useful for this. (I'm pretty sure I've come across papers > discussing this last concept.) > > thanks, > Nat > > > > CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |