| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] prediction of anomalous signal |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: prediction of anomalous signal From: James Holton JMHolton {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV Date: 2010-06-30 Woops! Sorry in case I just confused a lot of people. The number Felix reports: n_xtals = 0.078 means that the structure solution should have been "easy" (I.E. it could have been done with a crystal having only 8% of the volume used), and indeed it sounds like it was a slam dunk. So, it sounds like Felix got a good prediction from it. However, I am still very interested if anyone can solve a structure from a case where my predictor says that you can't. -James Holton MAD Scientist On 6/29/2010 4:18 PM, James Holton wrote: > On 6/29/2010 12:55 PM, Felix Frolow wrote: >> BTW James Holton website calculate for this case 0.078 crystal >> > > So far, every single one of these "reports" has come down to a > misinterpretation of the web interface. I am trying to make it > clearer, so I am interested in what values were entered into the > various fields when someone gets a result that they think is not > consistent with a real experiment that they did! > > http://bl831.als.lbl.gov/xtalsize.html > > BTW, this is a JavaScript program, so it runs on your web browser, not > my server. This means I am not spying on you, but it also means that > there is no way for me to tell what people are typing into it. > > -James Holton > MAD Scientist CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |