[ccp4bb] resolution vs ramachandran

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

- Protein purification
- Crystallisation

Special:

- Programs for crystallography
- X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

- CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999

Previous message:
Subject: some resources for working with new pdbv3 format
From: Robert Immormino immormino {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2007-08-03

Next message:
Subject: Volume calculation of a crevice
From: Enrique_Rudiño-Piñera enrique {- dot -} rudino {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2007-08-03

Subject: resolution vs ramachandran
From: Xiaofei Jia nesky_jia {- at -} YAHOO {- dot -} COM {- dot -} CN
Date: 2007-08-03

Dear all,

I am now preparing my structure for deposition. The
crystal diffracts to 3.0 A. R: 0.20; R free: 0.25.
What I am concerned with is the Ramachandran plot;
83.5% in core region, 15.8% in allowed, 0.5 % in
general allowed,0.2% in disallowed region. The model
fits in density pretty well and all the attempts to
improve Ramachandran have not been successful after
quite a few trials. I am wondering if 83.5 % in core
region is acceptable with 3.0 A resolution data?
Moreover, is there some numeric correlation between
diffraction resolution and model Ramachandran? Thank
you for your help.

Xiaofei

____________________________________________________________________________________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999

Previous message:
Subject: some resources for working with new pdbv3 format
From: Robert Immormino immormino {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2007-08-03

Next message:
Subject: Volume calculation of a crevice
From: Enrique_Rudiño-Piñera enrique {- dot -} rudino {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2007-08-03