| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] resolution vs ramachandran |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: resolution vs ramachandran From: Edward Berry eaberry {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV Date: 2007-08-03 Procheck puts out such a correlation (% most favorable vs resolution) in the _04.ps file. For example look at page 7, first panel of the sample procheck output at: http://sb20.lbl.gov/SQR/procheck-2H88.pdf It appears that 83.5% would be well above average for a 3 A structure according to procheck statistics. (However I think most structures nowadays are "above average" by procheck statistics) Ed Xiaofei Jia wrote: > Dear all, > > I am now preparing my structure for deposition. The > crystal diffracts to 3.0 A. R: 0.20; R free: 0.25. > What I am concerned with is the Ramachandran plot; > 83.5% in core region, 15.8% in allowed, 0.5 % in > general allowed,0.2% in disallowed region. The model > fits in density pretty well and all the attempts to > improve Ramachandran have not been successful after > quite a few trials. I am wondering if 83.5 % in core > region is acceptable with 3.0 A resolution data? > Moreover, is there some numeric correlation between > diffraction resolution and model Ramachandran? Thank > you for your help. > > Xiaofei > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. > http://sims.yahoo.com/ CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |