Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford Xcalibur Vs Rigaku micromax

Protein crystallography Programs for crystallography X-ray detectors
Basic tutorials:
Protein Peptide

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- February 2007 <-- 28 February 2007

Previous message:
Subject: Re: Oxford Xcalibur Vs Rigaku micromax
From: rangel {- at -} VT {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-02-28

Next message:
Subject: Re: Cannot running NTA to purify the protein having His-tag?
From: jbosch {- at -} U {- dot -} WASHINGTON {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-02-28

Subject: Re: Oxford Xcalibur Vs Rigaku micromax
From: Sue {- dot -} Byram {- at -} BRUKER-AXS {- dot -} COM
Date: 2007-02-28

Well since Jim answered I must do also!! Bruker, together with Incoatec,
has on the market a new Incoatec Microfocus Source with novel QUAZAR
multilayer optics which in my understanding is significantly brighter
than the other systems referred to. This source is very interesting as
it is air cooled - no need for plumbing.

All these models are excellent for their performance compared to the
older style 5.4 kw 300 micron focus generators and are small footprint,
simple systems. They do not equal the brightness of the current
microfocus rotating anode generators (eg Bruker MICROSTAR ULTRA) which
have greatly surpassed the older style 300 micron systems.
We try to give you new technology to help you do excellent science.

All the best
Sue Byram

............................................
Susan K. Byram
Business Manager
Crystallographic Systems
Bruker AXS Inc.
5465 East Cheryl Parkway
Madison, WI 53711 USA
Toll-free tel.: (800) 234-XRAY
Tel.: (608) 276-3041
Fax: (608) 276-3006
e-mail: sue.byram@bruker-axs.com
WWW: http://www.bruker-axs.com
............................................
please note my current email address. The old one
sbyram@bruker-axs.com no longer functions.

-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Jim Pflugrath
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:36 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford Xcalibur Vs Rigaku micromax

Of course, the Rigaku system would be the best.

Jim

On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Sankar Narayanan Manicka wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Our lab is planning to buy an X-ray machine for protein
crystallography.
>
> Which system would be best for home source, Oxford diffraction system
> Xcalibur Nova or a MSC/Rigaku MicroMax-002.
>
>
> sincerely,
> sankar
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Sankar narayanan Manicka sankar@mkustrbioinfo.com
> C/o Prof. S. Krishnaswamy +91 452 245 9931 - tel
> School of Biotechnology +91 452 245 9105 - fax
> Madurai 625 021 +91 94860 88613 - cell
> TAMIL NADU INDIA http://www.mkuniversity.org/biotech_school.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------l
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- February 2007 <-- 28 February 2007

Previous message:
Subject: Re: Oxford Xcalibur Vs Rigaku micromax
From: rangel {- at -} VT {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-02-28

Next message:
Subject: Re: Cannot running NTA to purify the protein having His-tag?
From: jbosch {- at -} U {- dot -} WASHINGTON {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-02-28