Quick navigation:        Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |   
Protein structure
 

[ccp4bb] Can't choose full H-M symbol for conventional cell ?

 

Basic tutorials:
 
 

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 16 March 2007
Previous message:
Subject: Re: refmac refinement and multiple conformations
From: Dirk Kostrewa dirk {- dot -} kostrewa {- at -} PSI {- dot -} CH
Date: 2007-03-16
Next message:
Subject: Re: B-factors in Shelxl
From: "Arti S {- dot -} Pandey" artis {- at -} CHEMISTRY {- dot -} MONTANA {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-03-16


Subject: Can't choose full H-M symbol for conventional cell ?
From: Ian Tickle I {- dot -} Tickle {- at -} ASTEX-THERAPEUTICS {- dot -} COM
Date: 2007-03-16


We're having some problems essentially because AFAICS Mosflm (and also
D*Trek) don't recognise the 'full' Hermann-Mauguin symbols for space
groups.

For example for space group no 18 with the 'short' H-M symbol 'P 2/1 2/1
2' in the setting with 'full' H-M symbol 'P 2 2/1 2/1' the programs
choose the correct conventional cell as say a=60, b=70, c=90 (according
to the convention a<=b<=c). But then unless I've missed something
obvious, they only seem to give the option to assign the short H-M
symbol; however the problem is that this doesn't uniquely define the
full H-M symbol (which in turn uniquely defines the general equivalent
positions), and of course in this case there are 3 possibilities (i.e.
with the 2-fold rotation axis along a, b or c resp.). Then the user,
seeing that there is only one option for SG 18, assumes that the program
knows what it's doing and naturally selects that, whereas in fact it
doesn't: it incorrectly equates the full H-M symbol to the short one,
and of course havoc breaks loose from there on!

Is there any reason why the programs don't allow the complete set of
full H-M symbols to be assigned (they are of course all defined in
syminfo.lib)?

Cheers

-- Ian

Disclaimer

This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient you must not review, use, disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Astex Therapeutics Ltd by emailing I.Tickle@astex-therapeutics.com and destroy all copies of the message and any attached documents.



Astex Therapeutics Ltd monitors, controls and protects all its messaging traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy. The Company accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the Astex Therapeutics domain. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of Astex Therapeutics Ltd. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of computer viruses. Astex Therapeutics Ltd accepts no liability for damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. E-mail is susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, and tampering, Astex Therapeutics Ltd only send and receive e-mails on the basis that the Company is not liable for any such alteration or any consequences thereof.

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 16 March 2007
Previous message:
Subject: Re: refmac refinement and multiple conformations
From: Dirk Kostrewa dirk {- dot -} kostrewa {- at -} PSI {- dot -} CH
Date: 2007-03-16
Next message:
Subject: Re: B-factors in Shelxl
From: "Arti S {- dot -} Pandey" artis {- at -} CHEMISTRY {- dot -} MONTANA {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2007-03-16



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd