| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
[ccp4bb] Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM From: "Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a {- dot -} D {- dot -} )" hofkristallamt {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM Date: 2012-04-07 Something the developers might be interested in: The Refmac_5.6.0117 32-bit windows binaries run native on a win64 3-4x slower than those from the linux distribution run **in a RHEL6.2-64 VMware virtual machine hosted the same windows7/64 system.....** VM/RHEL: Refmac_5.6.0117: End of Refmac_5.6.0117 Times: User: 1015.3s System: 135.0s Elapsed: 19:17 Win native Refmac_5.6.0117: End of Refmac_5.6.0117 Times: User: 0.0s System: 0.0s Elapsed: 67:49 Most peculiar....although I think but I do not know whether the linux binaries are 64 bit I don't think that address space is the issue here if they are. Maybe the paranoia-checkers in windows slow everything down although I did not see any resources overwhelmed... Best regards, BR ----------------------------------------------------------------- Bernhard Rupp 001 (925) 209-7429 +43 (676) 571-0536 br@ruppweb.org hofkristallamt@gmail.com http://www.ruppweb.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- No animals were hurt or killed during the production of this email. ----------------------------------------------------------------- CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |