| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
[ccp4bb] R-sleep |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: R-sleep From: "Mark J {- dot -} van Raaij" vanraaij {- at -} USC {- dot -} ES Date: 2007-10-01 Dear All, the short paper by Gerard Kleywegt (ActaD 63, 939-940) treats an interesting subject (at least I think so...). I agree that what we are now doing in many cases is effectively refining against Rfree. For example, the standard CNS torsion angle refinement does n refinement trials with randomised starting points. If you then take the one with lowest Rfree (or let a script do this for you), you are biasing Rfree! Therefore, his proposal to put an extra set of reflections in a dormant "vault" (R-sleep) sounds like a good idea to me. However, how would the "vault" be implemented to be effective? If left to the experimenter, it would be very tempting to check R-sleep once in a while (or often) during refinement, rendering it useless as an unbiased validator. or am I being paranoid and too pessimistic? Mark J. van Raaij Unidad de Bioquímica Estructural Dpto de Bioquímica, Facultad de Farmacia and Unidad de Rayos X, Edificio CACTUS Universidad de Santiago 15782 Santiago de Compostela Spain http://web.usc.es/~vanraaij/ CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |