| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | | |
|
Re: [ccp4bb] questions related to refmac refinement and map-fitting |
|
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 19 March 2007Subject: Re: questions related to refmac refinement and map-fitting From: Lari Lehtio lari {- dot -} lehtio {- at -} KI {- dot -} SE Date: 2007-03-19 You could turn down the weight on the B-factor restraints (in geometric parameters). It seems like the restraints are two tight and do not allow the B-factor to increase enough to fit the density. ~L~ _______________________________________ Lari Lehtiö Structural Genomics Consortium Medical Biochemistry & Biophysics Dept. Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden _______________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: lithomas Date: Monday, March 19, 2007 7:47 am Subject: [ccp4bb] questions related to refmac refinement and map-fitting To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Hello, > I am not sure if I can clearly explain the problem , but .. > > The protein structure that I tried to solve is 407 a.a. in length. > The crystal diffracts to 1.9 Ang and there is one molecule per asym > unit. The program that I used is Molrep. Currently I have put in > most of the residues and the R is 22.8% and the Rfree is 28.7% (no > water added yet) after refmac (v. 5.2) refinement. > > I had a hard time trying to finish the refinemnt task because I > noticed about ten residues' sidechains persistently had negative > density. Typically what I would do is to put these a.a. back to ala > and re-check the delFWT map in the next refinement cycle. However, > the refmac delFWT map in the next refinement cycle would show > strong positive (at least 2.5sigma) values. These amino acids don't > seem to have alternate conformations and the Rfactor increase <1% > and Rfree increase by 1%. Now, I seems to fall into this trap of > endless loop and trying to find a way out. > > Since this is the first time that I used refmac, I am not sure if I > did something wrong. Everything seems quite straightfoward from > the pull-down menu and a couple main parameters that I selected are > "restraint refinement", "no prior phase information", "anisotropic" > and "babinet scaling". I also tried CNS (v. 1.1) and the results > are pretty much the same. > > I know I should not let these residues bearing a large blob of > negative density on the very end of the side chains. But did anyone > have similar probelm and how to resolve this? > > Thanks for the help. > > Thomas > CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 19 March 2007 |
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd |