| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | | |
|
Re: [ccp4bb] R-sleep |
|
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- October 2007 <-- 01 October 2007Subject: Re: R-sleep From: James Whisstock James {- dot -} Whisstock {- at -} MED {- dot -} MONASH {- dot -} EDU {- dot -} AU Date: 2007-10-01 J William Scott > If R-sleep is to be the "real" validation R-factor, why not just > sequester > each of R-sleep and the current R-free, each as a randomly-chosen (but > mutually exclusive) set of reflections, and then proceed as normally with > the other (eg) 80% of the data until the very end of the refinement, > using > the R-free set to optimize weightings for geometries, NCS symmetry > averaging, and so forth, and then simply add those back in at the > penultimate step of refinement. In the end, you have R-sleep and the > Rfactor corresponding to the rest of the data, just like before, and you > can have the additional statistic reporting the difference between > R-sleep > and and R-free, which we could call something like the R-i-didn't-peak. > > > Peter Adrian Meyer wrote: >> This raises a slightly tangential question though - how do we know how >> what obs/param ratio is good enough? -- Professor James Whisstock NHMRC Principal Research Fellow / Monash University Senior Logan fellow Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Monash University, Clayton Campus, PO Box 13d, VIC, 3800, Australia +613 9905 3747 (Phone) +613 9905 4699 (Fax) +61 418 170 585 (Mobile) CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- October 2007 <-- 01 October 2007 |
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd |