| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] Bad sidechain geometry |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: Bad sidechain geometry From: Anastassis Perrakis a {- dot -} perrakis {- at -} NKI {- dot -} NL Date: 2007-10-16 On 16 Oct 2007, at 8:44, Tim Gruene wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Iain, > > I know there are (at least) two schools of thought and both have > their justification, and my suggestion does not explain you > phenomenon. > > However, instead of setting the occupancy to zero, I would rather > delete the affected atoms/ residues. > > In my point of view this would make your submitted structure less > error prone, especially to non-crystallographers, because they > usually just look at the PDB file with a graphics viewer rather > than the PDB file itself (and most viewers, unlike coot, do not > highlight atoms with zero occupancy). Oh - its been a year since we did not have "Episode 17: The return of the Positionally Challenged" ! Although I am confident Garib will clear the landscape soon (0 occ atoms are ignored for for everything, including restraints; it is an old PROLSQ 'feature' that has been adopted by REFMACx as far as I know). I personally btw like to leave the atoms there and let B's go high, with similar arguments like Tim's, and with similar 'side-effects'. Better be clear that a long side chains is there, rather than think its Alanine. But, I am sure the archive has loads on that, including all the arguments that counter the above. Maybe I will set up a ballot in the (coming soon!) ARP/wARP blog ;-) Tassos > > Omitting these residues should help correct interpretation of you > data by others than you. > > As a side effect, it would solve your problem of bonds becoming > distorted. > > Tim > > > - -- > Tim Gruene > Institut fuer anorganische Chemie > Tammannstr. 4 > D-37077 Goettingen > > GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A > > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Iain Kerr wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I'm refining a structure (with TLS, Hs in riding positions) to >> 2.9A - Rfree ~29.9%/Rfac 26.5% in Refmac5 v5.2.0019. Rmsd bonds >> 0.008A/1.1deg angles. >> >> In COOT (0.31) many of the residues whose side chains are (fully >> or partially) set to 0.00 occupancy have really bad geometry...for >> want of a better description, the side-chains literally look like >> they have exploded...a few are intact but have distorted >> planarity. This occurs in 25 residues out of 480 in the ASU. >> >> I have tried: >> >> 1. refining without TLS - no change >> 2. no hydrogens - no change >> 3. refining OVERall B-factors instead of ISOtropic - overall >> geometry much worse (rmsd 0.088 bonds) >> 4. DAMP 0.5 0.5 - no change >> 5. BABINET scaling instead of SIMPLE - no change in geometry, >> Rfree and Rfac increase ~3% >> 6. relaxing geometry (rmsd 0.019A bonds/1.8deg angles) >> >> This occurs with two other structures at higher resolution >> (~2.5A), although only a few violations..it seems to be much worse >> at low resolution. >> >> Any ideas ? >> >> Thanks, >> Iain >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFHFF3uUxlJ7aRr7hoRAivQAKDcwJA3N7ogdVDkI/jgCaYYy7SoAQCg7GRX > zcKlycSzlE92bLXJlsrj+Iw= > =uxaZ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |