| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |||
Re: [ccp4bb] To bathe or not to bathe. |
||||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: To bathe or not to bathe. From: Richard Gillilan reg8 {- at -} CORNELL {- dot -} EDU Date: 2007-11-26 In our current helium box, there is a total of about 28 mm of beam exposed. 10 mm from the aperture of the optic and 18 mm from sample to beamstop. The 10 mm side working distance is very tight for hand mounting (little room for tongs) and falls just outside the shield stream for cryo. Could probably decrease the 28 mm some, but not below 10 mm I think. I think our standard setup places the collimator ion chamber about 20 mm from sample ... so 30-50 mm may not be far off the mark for typical stations. Usually, it is the virus crystallographers who are fussy about getting the smallest beamstop. Next time, I'll have to whip out a ruler and see what distance makes them happy. It would be interesting to know typical distances for other facilities. Anyone else made these measurements? Richard Gillilan MacCHESS > Note the density of air is approximately 1000 times less than a > protein > crystal. The total scatter for a beam going through a 50 micron thick > crystal will be similar to that from 50mm air. Most beamlines will > have > a path length less than this but nevertheless the air scatter will be > significant with small crystals. > In principle, with smaller beams one can have smaller beamstops nearer > the sample thus reducing the path length through the air. > > Colin CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|||
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |