| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |||
Re: [ccp4bb] Ramachandran statistics |
||||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: Ramachandran statistics From: Ethan Merritt merritt {- at -} U {- dot -} WASHINGTON {- dot -} EDU Date: 2008-01-02 On Wednesday 02 January 2008 10:17, mark Mayer wrote: > > Is there a consensus about which program / data base most accurately reports Ramachandran > statistics? I believe that PROCHECK inaccurately flags outliers because the data base was compiled > many years ago, and there are now many more high resolution structures. Likewise I think I've heard > (no insults intended) that the Richardson library used by MOLPROBITY is a bit too generous? I am not aware of any grounds to doubt the Molprobity distributions. By "too generous", do you mean that the sigma levels corresponding to category boundaries are too high, or do you mean that the quality of structures used to generate the distribution tables was not sufficiently stringent, or what? > What are people using currently to report Ramachandran statistics in papers? Molprobity. -- Ethan A Merritt Courier Deliveries: 1959 NE Pacific Dept of Biochemistry Health Sciences Building University of Washington - Seattle WA 98195-7742 CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|||
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |