| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | | |
|
Re: [ccp4bb] low-res cutoff in refinement |
|
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- January 2008 <-- 24 January 2008Subject: Re: low-res cutoff in refinement From: Pavel Afonine PAfonine {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV Date: 2008-01-24 try phenix.refine: it uses very efficient and robust bulk solvent correction and anisotropic scaling protocol (Acta Cryst. (2005). D61, 850-855) as well as it automatically detects and removes reflections-outliers before the refinement starts. I think the combination of these things may help. More information: http://phenix-online.org/ http://phenix-online.org/documentation/ http://phenix-online.org/documentation/refinement.htm or replay me with your questions. Cheers, Pavel. On 1/24/2008 3:21 PM, Van Den Berg, Bert wrote: > > Hi all, > > during refinement of our (membrane protein) structures, basically in > all cases the R/Rfree values depend a lot on the low resolution > cutoff. Putting the cutoff at lower res (20-50 A) results in > substantially higher R/Rfree values (sometimes few percent). For this > reason we mostly refine the data from the high-res limit down to 10A > or so. I have noticed that this occurs fairly often in the literature, > but I don't know if this is a membrane protein related issue or not. > > Could it be that the bulk solvent model used in CNS (we refine > exclusively with CNS) does not model the situation with membrane > proteins, due to the presence of detergents? Or is it related to data > collection issues (low-res spots overloaded etc)? Anything else? What > could be done to overcome the problem, and to use all the data in > refinement? > > Thanks, Bert > > Bert van den Berg > University of Massachusetts Medical School > Program in Molecular Medicine > Biotech II, 373 Plantation Street, Suite 115 > > CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- January 2008 <-- 24 January 2008 |
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd |