Quick navigation:        Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |   
Protein structure
 

Re: [ccp4bb] an over refined structure

 

Basic tutorials:
 
 

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- February 2008 <-- 08 February 2008
Previous message:
Subject: FW: Different chains in the dimer
From: "Skrzypczak-Jankun, Ewa" Ewa {- dot -} Skrzypczak-Jankun {- at -} UTOLEDO {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-02-08
Next message:
Subject: Re: an over refined structure
From: Dale Tronrud det102 {- at -} UOXRAY {- dot -} UOREGON {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-02-08


Subject: Re: an over refined structure
From: price {- at -} UCHICAGO {- dot -} EDU price {- at -} UCHICAGO {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-02-08

Rotational near-crystallographic ncs is easy to handle this way, but
what about translational pseudo-symmetry (or should that be
pseudo-translational symmetry)? In such cases one whole set of spots
is systematically weaker than the other set. Then what is the
"theoretically correct" way to calculate Rfree? Write one's own code
to sort the spots into two piles?
Phoebe

At 01:05 PM 2/8/2008, Axel Brunger wrote:
>In such cases, we always define the test set first in the high-symmetry
>space group choice. Then, if it is warranted to lower the crystallographic
>symmetry and replace with NCS symmetry, we expand the test set
>to the lower symmetry space group. In other words, the test set itself
>will be invariant upon applying any of the crystallographic or NCS operators,
>so will be maximally "free" in these cases. It is then also possible to
>directly compare the free R between the high and low crystallographic
>space group choices.
>
>Our recent Neuroligin structure is such an example (Arac et al.,
>Neuron 56, 992-, 2007).
>
>
>Axel
>
>
>
>
>On Feb 8, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Ronald E Stenkamp wrote:
>
>>I've looked at about 10 cases where structures have been refined in lower
>>symmetry space groups. When you make the NCS operators into
>>crystallographic
>>operators, you don't change the refinement much, at least in terms of
>>structural changes. That's the case whether NCS restraints have
>>been applied
>>or not. In the cases I've re-done, changing the refinement program
>>and dealing
>>with test set choices makes some difference in the R and Rfree values. One
>>effect of changing the space group is whether you realize the copies of the
>>molecule in the lower symmetry asymmetric unit are "identical" or
>>not. (Where
>>"identical" means crystallographically identical, i.e., in the same packing
>>environments, subject to all the caveats about accuracy, precision, thermal
>>motion, etc). Another effect of going to higher symmetry space groups of
>>course has to do with explaining the experimental data with simpler
>>and smaller
>>mathematical models (Occam's razor or the Principle of Parsimony).
>>
>>Ron
>
>Axel T. Brunger
>Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute
>Professor of Molecular and Cellular Physiology
>Stanford University
>
>Web: http://atb.slac.stanford.edu
>Email: brunger@stanford.edu
>Phone: +1 650-736-1031
>Fax: +1 650-745-1463
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phoebe A. Rice
Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
The University of Chicago
phone 773 834 1723
fax 773 702 0439
http://bmb.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/multimedia/pia06064.html

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- February 2008 <-- 08 February 2008
Previous message:
Subject: FW: Different chains in the dimer
From: "Skrzypczak-Jankun, Ewa" Ewa {- dot -} Skrzypczak-Jankun {- at -} UTOLEDO {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-02-08
Next message:
Subject: Re: an over refined structure
From: Dale Tronrud det102 {- at -} UOXRAY {- dot -} UOREGON {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-02-08



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd