| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | | |
|
Re: [ccp4bb] Valid to stop Refmac after TLS refinement? |
|
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 28 March 2007Subject: Re: Valid to stop Refmac after TLS refinement? From: "NM Burton, Biochemistry" Nick {- dot -} Burton {- at -} BRISTOL {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK Date: 2007-03-28 The first kind replies have reminded me that I should have included information on the Refmac weighting term - it's set at 0.1, and the RMSD bonds/angles is 0.016/1.6 after Refmac co-ordinate refinement. So I'm assuming that is not the problem. And I made sure to keep the same Rfree set. Thanks again, Nick --On 28 March 2007 16:34 +0100 "NM Burton, Biochemistry" > Hello, > > I've refined a structure with CNS to Rwork/free=0.226/0.273. I switched > to Refmac5.2 to take advantage of TLS refinement and set up a run with 10 > cycles of TLS refinement (groups as suggested by the TLSMD server) > followed by 10 cycles of restrained co-ordinate refinement. After the > TLS cycles the model was improved (Rwork/free=0.222/0.241), however > during co-ordinate refinement Rfree refined up (final > Rwork/free=0.197/0.264). My understanding would be that the TLS > refinement is modelling the ADPs most accurately, but that Refmac's > co-ordinate refinement is over-fitting slightly. Would this seem > correct? And if so, is it valid to run Refmac with no cycles of > co-ordinate refinement and take the resulting model as the final > structure? > > Thanks very much, > > Nick > > ---------------------- > NM Burton, Biochemistry > Nick.Burton@bristol.ac.uk ---------------------- NM Burton, Biochemistry Nick.Burton@bristol.ac.uk CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 28 March 2007 |
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd |