| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] XDS and overlaps |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: XDS and overlaps From: Martin Hallberg Martin {- dot -} Hallberg {- at -} KI {- dot -} SE Date: 2008-02-22 There is of course nothing stopping you from having both severe overlap problems and twinning :-( > In this case, XDS-processed data is clearly twinned, if one were to > believe moments and the cumulative intensity distribution calculated > by truncate (and everyone should - channelling Dr. Dodson). > > Why I'm worried about XDS separating relatively overlapped spots is > the funny intensity stats that may result from this (as George > Sheldrick and Martin Hallberg has pointed out)? The incomplete > HKL2000-processed data (70%) still has intermediate values for the > intensity stats, leaning towards twinning. This somewhat agrees with > twinning, but not overzealous data integration. What happens if you play with spot parameters (to increase the number of reflections identified as overlaps) in Denzo? This will reduce the completeness even more but might be a worthwhile exercise to figure out what the problem really is. Can you get cleaner intensity statistics this way? Similarly, you can play with the MINPK parameter in XDS (as suggested by Kay). Best regards, Martin . B. Martin Hallberg, PhD Assistant professor Department of Cell and Molecular Biology Medical Nobel Institute Karolinska Institutet Nobels v. 3 SE-171 77 Stockholm Sweden CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |