| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |||
[ccp4bb] Rant: B vs TLS, anisou, and PDB headers |
||||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Rant: B vs TLS, anisou, and PDB headers From: Robbie Joosten rjoosten {- at -} CMBI {- dot -} RU {- dot -} NL Date: 2008-03-29 ANISOU records imply that individual anisotropic B-factors were refined. This will cause problems when you try to redo the final refinement: you add loads of parameters all of a sudden. Using ANISOU records may give you more reliable information about the B-factors, but not about the refinement. Cheers, Robbie Joosten From: "Winn, MD (Martyn)" Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 20:57 To: Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] [phenixbb] Rant: B vs TLS, anisou, and PDB headers >> 2) All you need to reproduce the R-factors are the ATOM records and >> structure factor formula (and not ATOM records, PDB header with TLS >> records that sometimes may be lost or manipulated and specific >> converting programs to add TLS contribution). Also note, that not all >> programs extract TLS information from PDB header to compute R-factors, >> but ALL programs can read ATOM records. > > As you have stated this, it is not true. The big plus with TLS is that it > models anisotropic displacements, which are not described in ATOM lines. > You would need to include the (derived) ANISOU lines to reproduce > R-factors. I bring this up again, because I feel undue respect is given to > the total B factor (I have heard it called the "true" B factor - I have no > idea what kind of truth that is!). > > Anyway, these are all different representations of the same thing, and > should work equally well so long as you know which you are using. The > scariest thing from the last thread was that our attempt to document it > with a REMARK 3 line is being stripped by the RCSB. > > Cheers > Martyn > CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|||
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |