| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
[ccp4bb] Refinement of low resolution structures |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Refinement of low resolution structures From: Paul Paukstelis paul {- at -} ICMB {- dot -} UTEXAS {- dot -} EDU Date: 2007-04-03 Hi all, I'm refining the structure of a complex at low resolution (4.5). Certainly refinement at low resolution will become more common, but there isn't a whole lot out there now to use as a guide. I've incorporated most of the suggestions from DeLaBarre and Brunger, but I'm looking for any other suggestions and I have a couple of specific questions. I have independent, high resolution structures for both molecules of the complex, and I got a nice solution from Phaser. There is 4-fold NCS (45,000 atoms in the ASU). Because of the low resolution I have also added manual restraints based on secondary structure of the individual structures to help the observation/parameter ratio. So far, I have been using tight NCS restraints in Refmac along with Babinet scaling for bulk solvent, fixed B for the solvent, and isotropic refinement for B factors. Currently, R=25.7 Rfree=30.0 and the difference between R and Rfree has stayed pretty constant from starting values in the 40's. I just loosened up the NCS and got a fairly significant drop in R (21.3)but a less significant drop in Rfree (28.8). The maps seem somewhat better with some possible ion sites getting stronger in the difference map. Should I worry about the large R change relative to Rfree? I also have some very strong density for a portion of a molecule (missing in the original structure) that I can't model unambiguously at this resolution. It is very likely in multiple conformations. I'm guessing this is going to cause the R factors to bottom out and I'm worried trying to push the R factors down without building this will lead to a some distortion around this area. Any suggestions on how to handle this? Finally, what would you like to see in a paper as validation for the correctness of a model at this resolution and phased by MR? Omit maps of key features? Yes, I am trying to get higher resolution data. Thanks in advance. --paul -- Paul Paukstelis, Ph.D. Research Associate Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology The University of Texas at Austin P: 512-471-4778, F: 512-232-3420 paul@icmb.utexas.edu CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |