| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] bigger size - > better diffraction? |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: bigger size - > better diffraction? From: artem {- at -} XTALS {- dot -} ORG artem {- at -} XTALS {- dot -} ORG Date: 2007-04-04 A small comment: crystals that do not diffract well at R.T. can still diffract well when frozen. There are several reasons for this, including: * poor stability of crystal once the drop is open to the air * crystal has low tolerance for handling (capillary mount can be challenging and cause more physical damage, especially if the experimenter is rusty with capillary mounts) * the effect of freezing - it has been known to cause transitions between space groups etc. * the effect of cryoprotectant (dehydration, and so forth) So - even if your stuff doesn't diffract well in a capillary - it still can be saved sometimes :) Or not. Artem > diffracts in general. It is true it may be a cryo problem, but if > the non cryo protected crystals do not diffract then why would one > expect the cryo protected one to. CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |