Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

Re: [ccp4bb] bigger size - > better diffraction?

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re: bigger size - > better diffraction?
From: Elspeth Garman elspeth {- at -} BIOP {- dot -} OX {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-04-04
Next message:
Subject: Re: cryo was:bigger size - > better diffraction?
From: Tommi Kajander tommi {- dot -} kajander {- at -} HELSINKI {- dot -} FI
Date: 2007-04-04


Subject: Re: bigger size - > better diffraction?
From: artem {- at -} XTALS {- dot -} ORG artem {- at -} XTALS {- dot -} ORG
Date: 2007-04-04

A small comment: crystals that do not diffract well at R.T. can still
diffract well when frozen. There are several reasons for this, including:

* poor stability of crystal once the drop is open to the air

* crystal has low tolerance for handling (capillary mount can be
challenging and cause more physical damage, especially if the
experimenter is rusty with capillary mounts)

* the effect of freezing - it has been known to cause transitions between
space groups etc.

* the effect of cryoprotectant (dehydration, and so forth)

So - even if your stuff doesn't diffract well in a capillary - it still
can be saved sometimes :) Or not.

Artem

> diffracts in general. It is true it may be a cryo problem, but if
> the non cryo protected crystals do not diffract then why would one
> expect the cryo protected one to.

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re: bigger size - > better diffraction?
From: Elspeth Garman elspeth {- at -} BIOP {- dot -} OX {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-04-04
Next message:
Subject: Re: cryo was:bigger size - > better diffraction?
From: Tommi Kajander tommi {- dot -} kajander {- at -} HELSINKI {- dot -} FI
Date: 2007-04-04



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd