| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
[ccp4bb] Post facto fix to R-free selection |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Post facto fix to R-free selection From: "Harry M {- dot -} Greenblatt" harry {- dot -} greenblatt {- at -} WEIZMANN {- dot -} AC {- dot -} IL Date: 2007-04-10 BS"D Dear All, Someone has come to ask my opinion about some inhibitor-protein complexes they have refined, isomorphous with a known native structure (P21212). After a short look at the statistics, I became suspicious about the R-free selection for the new complexes. Indeed, the person was not careful about taking the the same R-free set as the native. Each complex had a new R-free set, and Refmac was used (i.e., they did not benefit from simulated annealing, which according to some would have saved the situation). So the difference between R and Rfree is about 2-3% for each structure, since the structures are biased to a large fraction of the new Rfree set. Technically, the process was incorrect, but how can they remedy the situation (short of starting from scratch with the proper Rfree set)? Run simulated annealing now, and then a round of Refmac? Thanks, Harry ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Harry M. Greenblatt Staff Scientist Dept of Structural Biology harry.greenblatt@weizmann.ac.il Weizmann Institute of Science Phone: 972-8-934-3625 Rehovot, 76100 Facsimile: 972-8-934-4159 Israel CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |