| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | | |
|
Re: [ccp4bb] poll: cutoff for "high resolution" |
|
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- May 2008 <-- 14 May 2008Subject: Re: poll: cutoff for "high resolution" From: Edward Snell esnell {- at -} HWI {- dot -} BUFFALO {- dot -} EDU Date: 2008-05-14 depends on molecular weight, i.e. high resolution for insulin and high resolution for the ribosome are going to be very different numbers. Other than that, my answer would be that you know it when you've got it :) Cheers, Eddie. Edward Snell Ph.D. Assistant Prof. Department of Structural Biology, SUNY Buffalo, Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute 700 Ellicott Street, Buffalo, NY 14203-1102 Phone: (716) 898 8631 Fax: (716) 898 8660 Email: esnell@hwi.buffalo.edu Telepathy: 42.2 GHz Heisenberg was probably here! -----Original Message----- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Mark Del Campo Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 3:28 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] poll: cutoff for "high resolution" At what refinement resolution or resolution ranges would you call a structure "high resolution" vs. "low resolution"? I realize that this may boil down to semantics (e.g. some may classify structures as "medium resolution"), but I wanted to get an opinion from the pros. CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- May 2008 <-- 14 May 2008 |
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd |