Quick navigation:        Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |   
Protein structure
 

Re: [ccp4bb] poll: cutoff for "high resolution"
 

Basic tutorials: 		 
 

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- May 2008 <-- 14 May 2008
Previous message:
Subject: Re: poll: cutoff for "high resolution"
From: Edward Snell esnell {- at -} HWI {- dot -} BUFFALO {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-05-14 		Next message:
Subject: While on the subject of stereo
From: David Roberts droberts {- at -} DEPAUW {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-05-14


Subject: Re: poll: cutoff for "high resolution"
From: Pavel Afonine PAfonine {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV
Date: 2008-05-14
I think this is coupled with the data completeness. Say you have a data
50.0-1.0A resolution, but the completeness in say 3.0-1.0A resolution
range is equal to 10%, and it is 100% complete in 50.0-3.0A.
Pavel.


On 5/14/2008 12:28 PM, Mark Del Campo wrote:
> At what refinement resolution or resolution ranges would you call a structure "high resolution" vs.
> "low resolution"? I realize that this may boil down to semantics (e.g. some may classify structures as
> "medium resolution"), but I wanted to get an opinion from the pros.
>

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- May 2008 <-- 14 May 2008
Previous message:
Subject: Re: poll: cutoff for "high resolution"
From: Edward Snell esnell {- at -} HWI {- dot -} BUFFALO {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-05-14 		Next message:
Subject: While on the subject of stereo
From: David Roberts droberts {- at -} DEPAUW {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-05-14


ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd