Re: [ccp4bb] poll: cutoff for "high resolution"

Protein crystallography Programs for crystallography X-ray detectors
Basic tutorials:
Protein Peptide

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- May 2008 <-- 15 May 2008

Previous message:
Subject: Re: poll: cutoff for "high resolution"
From: Bernhard Rupp bernhardrupp {- at -} SBCGLOBAL {- dot -} NET
Date: 2008-05-15

Next message:
Subject: Re: poll: cutoff for "high resolution"
From: William Scott wgscott {- at -} CHEMISTRY {- dot -} UCSC {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-05-15

Subject: Re: poll: cutoff for "high resolution"
From: Ed Pozharski epozh001 {- at -} UMARYLAND {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-05-15

Of course. However, C=0 bond is ~1.2A, and bonds made by those pesky
hydrogens are ~1A. And I would think (it is semantics again) that to
reach atomic resolution you have to resolve all atoms, otherwise

"All atoms are equal, but some (non-hydrogens) are more equal than
others."

Cheers,

Ed.

On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 10:08 -0700, William Scott wrote:
> On May 15, 2008, at 10:01 AM, Ed Pozharski wrote:
>
> > 1.2A (not surprisingly since this is about the length of covalent
> > bond).
>
> A carbon-carbon single bond is about 1.55 Å.
--
Edwin Pozharski, PhD, Assistant Professor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
----------------------------------------------
When the Way is forgotten duty and justice appear;
Then knowledge and wisdom are born along with hypocrisy.
When harmonious relationships dissolve then respect and devotion arise;
When a nation falls to chaos then loyalty and patriotism are born.
------------------------------ / Lao Tse /

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- May 2008 <-- 15 May 2008

Previous message:
Subject: Re: poll: cutoff for "high resolution"
From: Bernhard Rupp bernhardrupp {- at -} SBCGLOBAL {- dot -} NET
Date: 2008-05-15

Next message:
Subject: Re: poll: cutoff for "high resolution"
From: William Scott wgscott {- at -} CHEMISTRY {- dot -} UCSC {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-05-15