Quick navigation:        Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |   
Protein structure
 

Re: [ccp4bb] UV light source for protein xtal detection
 

Basic tutorials: 		 
 

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- May 2008 <-- 15 May 2008
Previous message:
Subject: Re: poll: cutoff for "high resolution"
From: Ed Pozharski epozh001 {- at -} UMARYLAND {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-05-15 		Next message:
Subject: Research Associate I/II position
From: "Oganesyan, Vaheh" OganesyanV {- at -} MEDIMMUNE {- dot -} COM
Date: 2008-05-15


Subject: Re: UV light source for protein xtal detection
From: "V {- dot -} Nagarajan" tatoosh {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2008-05-15
We are about to release an all-LED based UV microscope for automated
scanning of 96-well plates. Please contact me if you are interested.

Thanks,

V. Nagarajan
JAN Scientific, Inc.
Seattle, WA, USA.

-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Li
Zhijie
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:36 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] UV light source for protein xtal detection

Hello,

You may want to have a look at the UV LEDs, which should be the cheapest
option if you only need a specific wavelenth.

I found this on google: http://www.3dzled.com/other.html. It seems that they

can make 280nM LEDs. It is interesting to note that they also said these
LEDs' "Wavelength tolerance is usually within +/- 5 nm. For example 254 nm
would be 249 nm to 259 nm and 415 nm would be 410 nm to 415 nm or 415 nm to
420 nm" - apparently not as pure as those generated by monochrometers, but
should be good enough for quatitating protein or exciting some fluorophores.

I wonder if the microscope makers would ever consider using these instead of

those multi-thousand $ light sources.

One more thing: do not forget that 280nm UV is extremely harmful to human
eyes and skin.

Zhijie Li

----- Original Message -----
From: "Torres-Larios Alfredo"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 7:59 PM
Subject: [ccp4bb] UV light source for protein xtal detection


> Dear all,
>
> Here's another non CCP4 question: does anyone know a cheap alternative to
> set up a UV source at 280 nm? I'd really like to have one :), but I really

> don't have the $20K Dlls needed to buy a UV/white light source from the
> crystallographic vendors :(.
>
> Thanks so much in advance for your answers, Alfredo.
>
> Alfredo Torres-Larios, PhD
> Assistant Professor
> Instituto de Fisiologia Celular, UNAM.
> Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1077 - Release Date:
> 5/11/2008 12:00 AM
>
>



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd