| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
[ccp4bb] Refinement of anisotropic data |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Refinement of anisotropic data From: yang li robertcatrukie {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM Date: 2008-05-21 Hi, I have a structure with 3 different resolutions, 2.3A, 2.4A, 2.5A, the qualities seem normal, not good but also not too bad. The B factors along a,b,c axis have notable difference, for example B(a)=80, B(b)=30, B(c)=20. We used molecular replacement to solve the structure. For the 2.3A data, the final Rfree is 0.265 from phenix.refine without tls since tls will increase the Rfree much. But for the 2.4A data, the Rfree wonnot low down to 0.32, though the map seems not bad(with only a few solvent atoms). And for the 2.5A data the Rfree is even higher than 0.4. For all of them I used thinshell and followed the same procedure: MR-->rigid body refinement-->restrain refinement-->phenix.autobuild-->manually check-->phenix.refine(ordered solvent) And autobuild can always build more than 80% residues with mostly side chains. This is not a big structure with no more than 1000 residues in 2 molecules. I wonder why the R values keep so high. Do I need to run anisotropic refinement for such resolutions? Or any other reasons? Thanks! CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |