Re: [ccp4bb] libcheck error

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

- Protein purification
- Crystallisation

Special:

- Programs for crystallography
- X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

- CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999

Previous message:
Subject: libcheck error
From: Alex Theodossis Alex {- dot -} Theodossis {- at -} MED {- dot -} MONASH {- dot -} EDU {- dot -} AU
Date: 2008-08-20

Next message:
Subject: Re: Lower completeness, decent R factors, but low B factor...
From: Wim Burmeister wpb {- at -} EMBL {- dot -} FR
Date: 2008-08-20

Subject: Re: libcheck error
From: Tim Gruene tg {- at -} SHELX {- dot -} UNI-AC {- dot -} GWDG {- dot -} DE
Date: 2008-08-20

Hi,

did you compile ccp4 yourself? I remember this "not enough memory" message
from when I used an immature fortran compiler (gfortran < 4.1).
Tim

--
Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Alex Theodossis wrote:

> I'm trying to run the CCP4i 6.0.2 implementation of libcheck on an intel Mac running 10.5.4, but not able to list monomers. The error message prompts me to look at the file 215_4.tmp, which ends with:
>
>
> ------------------------------
> --- LIBRARY OF MONOMERS ---
> _lib_name mon_lib
> _lib_version 4.13
> _lib_update 18/01/08
> ------------------------------
> NUMBER OF MONOMERS IN THE LIBRARY : 2436
> with complete description : 455
> NUMBER OF MODIFICATIONS : 47
> NUMBER OF LINKS : 64
> ERROR: in LIB_CREATE_INDEX2: not memory enough:
>
> CCP4: Fatal error, see above.
>
>
>
>
> This problem appears to have been reported in June, but I can't find any responses to it.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Alex
>

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999

Previous message:
Subject: libcheck error
From: Alex Theodossis Alex {- dot -} Theodossis {- at -} MED {- dot -} MONASH {- dot -} EDU {- dot -} AU
Date: 2008-08-20

Next message:
Subject: Re: Lower completeness, decent R factors, but low B factor...
From: Wim Burmeister wpb {- at -} EMBL {- dot -} FR
Date: 2008-08-20