Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

Re: [ccp4bb] Lower completeness, decent R factors, but low B factor...

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re: Lower completeness, decent R factors, but low B factor...
From: Wim Burmeister wpb {- at -} EMBL {- dot -} FR
Date: 2008-08-20
Next message:
Subject: Re: Refmac problems on Mac OS X Leopard
From: Louise Gourlay louise {- dot -} gourlay {- at -} GUEST {- dot -} UNIMI {- dot -} IT
Date: 2008-08-20


Subject: Re: Lower completeness, decent R factors, but low B factor...
From: Anastassis Perrakis a {- dot -} perrakis {- at -} NKI {- dot -} NL
Date: 2008-08-20

On 20 Aug 2008, at 8:11, Wim Burmeister wrote:

> James Pauff a écrit :
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a refined structure at 2.6 angstroms that at about 73%
>> completeness at this resolution. The I/sigma is about 2.0 at 2.6
>> angstroms, and the omit density for my ligands is great contoured
>> at 3.0sigma. My Rcryst is 19 or so and the Rfree is 24.5 or so.
>>
>> HOWEVER, my mean B value is 13.9, whereas my other 2 structures
>> (at 2.2 and 2.3 angstroms, same protein, >95% completeness) have
>> mean B values of 22+. Any suggestions as to what is going on
>> here? I'm having trouble explaining this.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Jim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Dear Jim,
>
> probably you did not collect your data to the highest possible
> resolution. Did you use an inhouse source? You would expect that a
> crystal with an average temperature factor of 14 A2 would diffract
> to 1.6 A on a synchrotron source.
>
> Regards
>
> Wim
>

Indeed.

I could also speculate that if the completeness is 75% because 25%
of the *weakest* reflections are missing that would artificially show
a lower B factor. Did you look at the actual Wilson B plot - if not
do, you can learn a lot of simple things from this graph (its there
in the Truncate output, usually part of a scaling run, after SCALA)

A.


> --
> **********************************************************************
> *********
> Wim Burmeister
> Professeur, Membre de l'Institut Universitaire de France
> Unit of Virus Host Cell Interactions (UVHCI) UMR5233 UJF-EMBL-CNRS
> 6 rue Jules Horowitz
> B.P. 181, F-38042 Grenoble Cedex 9 FRANCE
> E-mail: wpb@embl.fr
> Tel: +33 (0) 476 20 72 82 Fax: +33 (0) 476 20 94 00
> http://www.uvhci.fr
> **********************************************************************
> *********

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re: Lower completeness, decent R factors, but low B factor...
From: Wim Burmeister wpb {- at -} EMBL {- dot -} FR
Date: 2008-08-20
Next message:
Subject: Re: Refmac problems on Mac OS X Leopard
From: Louise Gourlay louise {- dot -} gourlay {- at -} GUEST {- dot -} UNIMI {- dot -} IT
Date: 2008-08-20



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd