| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | | |
|
Re: [ccp4bb] I/sigma in XDS output |
|
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- April 2007 <-- 19 April 2007Subject: Re: I/sigma in XDS output From: Kay Diederichs kay {- dot -} diederichs {- at -} UNI-KONSTANZ {- dot -} DE Date: 2007-04-19 > Dear all, > I'm a bit confused from the output of the CORRECT step in XDS. In one of > the first tables I can read the mean I/sigma for each resolution shell, > but these values are much different from the I/sigma reported in the > table at the end of the output files, titled "completeness and quality > of data set" for the full data range with signal/noise > -3.0. For > example, from the first table I have I/sigma = 2 at 3.6 A, while from > the second table I have I/sigma = 2 at 2.8 A! > What is exactly the difference between the two values? And which one is > reliable to decide the resolution cutoff? > > > Thank you in advance, > > Michele Lunelli > MPI for Infection Biology > Berlin - Germany > Michele, the first table, which is long and fine-grained in resolution, has (citing CORRECT.LP): I/Sigma = mean intensity/Sigma of a reflection in shell and is thus talking about individual reflections _before_ merging symmetry equivalents. Later tables have (again citing CORRECT.LP): I/SIGMA = mean of intensity/Sigma(I) of unique reflections (after merging symmetry-related observations) and are thus giving statistics _after_ merging. The latter tables are suitable for deciding about the resol cutoff. HTH, Kay -- Kay Diederichs http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de email: Kay.Diederichs@uni-konstanz.de Tel +49 7531 88 4049 Fax 3183 Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Konstanz, Box M647, D-78457 Konstanz CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- April 2007 <-- 19 April 2007 |
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd |