| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
[ccp4bb] refmac and average B factors |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: refmac and average B factors From: Engin Ozkan eozkan {- at -} STANFORD {- dot -} EDU Date: 2008-10-04 Hi everyone, I was in the middle of creating a "Table 1" for a finished structure and was puzzled by one number. It is the average B factor, especially in the case of TLS-refined structures. In this case, the average reported by refmac in the header is the average of the B factors in the pdb file, which I assume is the residual B factors (right?) (A quick Baverage confirmed the number is the average of numbers in the B column). If the reported average is really for residual B factors, isn't this a bit misleading? In this case, the average B was 17, but after I created total B factors with TLSANL, average B was 25 A^2. I think total B factors should be the one reported, but I am afraid that might not have been the practice by many. It is such a petty point, but with TLS becoming common, shouldn't users be warned more about such issues? Or could Refmac report the average for total B factors? Engin P.S. I hate to bring up the controversy about the reporting of TLS-refined B factors (residual vs. full anisotropic, or refmac vs PHENIX), but it may come to that. CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |