Re: [ccp4bb] NCS-averaged composite omit map?

Protein crystallography Programs for crystallography X-ray detectors
Basic tutorials:
Protein Peptide

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- April 2007 <-- 30 April 2007

Previous message:
Subject: Re: problem with HKL2000 license
From: Frank von Delft frank {- dot -} vondelft {- at -} SGC {- dot -} OX {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-04-30

Next message:
Subject: Re: buried surface area
From: Eleanor Dodson ccp4 {- at -} YSBL {- dot -} YORK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-04-30

Subject: Re: NCS-averaged composite omit map?
From: Eleanor Dodson ccp4 {- at -} YSBL {- dot -} YORK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-04-30

Use COOT to do NCS averaging then look at the maps of B onto A a well as
the averaged one to see where differences might be.
Eleanor

Paul Paukstelis wrote:
> I'm working on a 4.5-A structure with 4-fold NCS. I've generated a SA
> composite omit map and all the protomers look pretty good, but with
> weaker density in mostly different parts for each. Am I correct that
> CNS doesn't do any NCS averaging automatically, and is there any
> reason why I shouldn't average the density with NCS matrix/protomer mask?
>
> --paul
>
>

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- April 2007 <-- 30 April 2007

Previous message:
Subject: Re: problem with HKL2000 license
From: Frank von Delft frank {- dot -} vondelft {- at -} SGC {- dot -} OX {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-04-30

Next message:
Subject: Re: buried surface area
From: Eleanor Dodson ccp4 {- at -} YSBL {- dot -} YORK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-04-30