Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

Re: [ccp4bb] refinment in lower space group vs. higher

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re: problem about BALBES
From: Xiang Liu pku06a15 {- at -} YAHOO {- dot -} COM {- dot -} CN
Date: 2009-01-04
Next message:
Subject: Re: refinment in lower space group vs. higher
From: Anastassis Perrakis a {- dot -} perrakis {- at -} NKI {- dot -} NL
Date: 2009-01-05


Subject: Re: refinment in lower space group vs. higher
From: Ronald E Stenkamp stenkamp {- at -} U {- dot -} WASHINGTON {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2009-01-05

Hi.

If the most precise and accurate description of your crystal structure is the orthorhombic one, you should average the replicated reflections and refine the structure in C2221. If the crystals are orthorhombic and you refine and report it in C2, you're producing a model that is larger and more complex than you need to explain the experimental data. You're also reporting to the world that the two molecules in the C2 asymmetric unit are different when there's no experimental evidence supporting that.

To extract the most information from your diffraction data, you should refine your structure in the highest symmetry space group consistent with the experimental data.

Ron


On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Yu Jiang wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I am now refining one structure in space group C2 with 2 molecules, however
> we find the data can be processed in C2221 with 1 molecule. The questions
> are:
>
> 1. Can I still use space group C2 instead of C2221, even if the two
> molecules almost have crystallographic symmetry? Should I provide any
> excuses?
>
> 2. Is there any indication or necessity to refine structures in lower space
> group instead of higher?
>
> Many thanks!
>
>
>
>

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re: problem about BALBES
From: Xiang Liu pku06a15 {- at -} YAHOO {- dot -} COM {- dot -} CN
Date: 2009-01-04
Next message:
Subject: Re: refinment in lower space group vs. higher
From: Anastassis Perrakis a {- dot -} perrakis {- at -} NKI {- dot -} NL
Date: 2009-01-05



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd