Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

Re: [ccp4bb] Google marks CCP4 web site as a potential security threat

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: Re: Google marks CCP4 web site as a potential security threat
From: Andrew Purkiss-Trew a {- dot -} purkiss {- at -} MAIL {- dot -} CRYST {- dot -} BBK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2009-01-31
Next message:
Subject: Re: Google marks CCP4 web site as a potential security threat
From: "William G {- dot -} Scott" wgscott {- at -} CHEMISTRY {- dot -} UCSC {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2009-01-31


Subject: Re: Google marks CCP4 web site as a potential security threat
From: Andrew Purkiss-Trew a {- dot -} purkiss {- at -} MAIL {- dot -} CRYST {- dot -} BBK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2009-01-31

Quoting "Miguel Ortiz Lombardia" :

>>>
>> The same is true for IUCr, Nature, Science, EMBO (!), Wiley, and
>> ScienceDirect websites, among many others... including google.com!
>>
>> Hope it's a (short-lived) bug.
>>
>> Pedro
>
>
> The bug is for them to decide what we have or have not to consider
> as a threat and to force us to change our websites as they please.
> They may change their filters in one hour or so and we won't notice
> this behaviour for our favourite, neutral and usually so compliant
> 'science' sites. I'm wary of the principle itself of Google shaping
> the internet as they want it to be.
>
> It seems they are free to do all that, but so we are to stop using Google.
>
> Best,
>

Personally I am in favour of such extra filtering. At least it might
give some warning for the less careful home users before they download
yet another worm that recruits their machine into a bot-net. If it
means an extra click to follow a link, then so be it. As you say, no
one is forced to use Google, but I imagine that if Google do it, so
will most of the other search engines.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.




ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd