| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | | |
|
Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac and B factors |
|
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- May 2007 <-- 10 May 2007Subject: Re: Refmac and B factors From: Roger Rowlett RRowlett {- at -} MAIL {- dot -} COLGATE {- dot -} EDU Date: 2007-05-10 crystallography in an efficient way. While it is possible to teach my undergraduates to write scripts for CNS, CCP4, and O, it is much, much easier for them to learn the CCP4 GUI. Sooner or later, real problems require you to look under the hood to some degree or other, so it is not so much a black box as one would think, but to the extent that it is, it has made crystallography accessible to many more investigators and students than otherwise. (If you had asked me a decade ago if my undergraduates would be solving protein X-ray structures I may have laughed.) Personally, I would like to see as many options as possible included in the GUI, just for consistency and ease of use, although I realize that this requires a lot more work on the developers' part. But when all else fails, there is always RTFM...or CCP4BB. Cheers, ___________________________________________ Roger S. Rowlett Professor Department of Chemistry Colgate University 13 Oak Drive Hamilton, NY 13346 tel: (315)-228-7245 ofc: (315)-228-7395 fax: (315)-228-7935 email: rrowlett@mail.colgate.edu -----Original Message----- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Kolstoe S.E. Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:09 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac and B factors Thanks very much for the replies, and especially for the link to the previous thread on this topic (Eva). Just a comment about the ccp4i GUI in general - pretty much all the students in my department are slowly becoming dependant on the GUI because it is so much easier to use for those brought up using MS windows. However, is it really fair to be distributing the GUI as a "finished" product when it has so many limitations, and in this particular case is just plain misleading? Although I applaud the idea of making crystallography more user friendly, is it not just asking for trouble (and bad science) when software is written that gives the illusion that things are more straight forward than they actually are? Simon ________________________________ From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Eva Kirchner Sent: 09 May 2007 17:37 To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac and B factors Hi Simon, you can't stop it - I asked the same question (with some more questions) some weeks ago. You can find the original email and the tips I got for not-so-good resolution B-factor refinement here: http://www.mail-archive.com/ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk/msg01224.html Good luck, Eva 2007/5/9, Kolstoe S.E. Dear all, I have a structure at fairly low resolution that I am trying to refine with Refmac. I do not want to refine B factors so have arbitrarily set them all to 20 and then run refmac in the ccp4i GUI after deselecting the "refine temperature factors" box. However, when I look at the resulting pdb file my B factors vary from 2 to 90. Is Refmac just calculating my B factors or is it still refining them, and if the latter how can I stop it? Thanks, Simon CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- May 2007 <-- 10 May 2007 |
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd |