Quick navigation:        Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |   
Protein structure
 

Re: [ccp4bb] CCP4 GUI

 

Basic tutorials:
 
 

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- May 2007 <-- 11 May 2007
Previous message:
Subject: CNS problem: anneal.inp segmentation fault
From: jean jean {- at -} SCIENCE {- dot -} UCT {- dot -} AC {- dot -} ZA
Date: 2007-05-11
Next message:
Subject: Re: Molecular Replacement issues with a WD-40 7-bladed beta propeller
From: Matthew {- dot -} Franklin {- at -} IMCLONE {- dot -} COM Matthew {- dot -} Franklin {- at -} IMCLONE {- dot -} COM
Date: 2007-05-11


Subject: Re: CCP4 GUI
From: "F {- dot -} Xavier Gomis-Rüth" xgrcri {- at -} IBMB {- dot -} CSIC {- dot -} ES
Date: 2007-05-11

In any case, I would just beg that you do not eliminate the possibility
tostill run the programs
on a command basis in the future.
Xavier Luddite

Martyn Winn wrote:

>This is timely. We're in the process of a) trying to organise a major
>effort to tidy up the existing ccp4i classic (rather than fire-fighting
>problems), and b) thinking about designing the next generation. Not sure
>which this is. Option b) would be a project over several years.
>
>Can you elucidate further. As an expert user, would you want a less
>scary free text box (which is essentially what Run&View Com File is), or
>actual widgets for every option. The latter could be done as a hidden
>folder, made visible according to an Expert switch in Preferences.
>
>As developers, we also have to think about long-term maintainability.
>Options, in particular little-used options, can soon become out-of-date.
>
>m
>
>
>On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 12:41 +0200, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>I'm a well-known luddite as Eleanor says. However, I shamelessly confess
>>that the CCP4 GUI is great. Not that I think this is necessary here, I'm
>>sure most people agree with that.
>>
>>If I write now is because Martynn's e-mail have reminded me of something
>>I thought once, but forgot to ask for to the ccp4i developpers: perhaps
>>the GUI could have "two faces/modes", a basic one and an expert/advanced
>>one. I understand that they already exist, but the "expert" one is
>>hidden under the "Run&View Com File", while I'm thinking on a real
>>expert GUI-mode. Users should be able to choose one or the other in
>>their defaults, or switch from one to the other on-the-fly.
>>
>>I don't have a particular problem in editing the scripts as it is done
>>now, but I have found that students tend to get a bit nervous about
>>doing it themselves ;-)
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>
>>Miguel
>>
>>Martyn Winn escribió:
>>
>>
>>>The level of detail in the GUI is a matter of constant debate. The
>>>underlying programs are far far richer, so the question is how much to
>>>expose in the GUI. We try to get a balance between ease-of-use and
>>>coverage, but it won't always work. BTW I don't think we ever claimed
>>>that ccp4i (or anything else in ccp4) is "finished" ;-)
>>>
>>>Having said that, we're always happy to hear about specific defects in
>>>the GUI. When reporting these to ccp4@dl.ac.uk please give as much
>>>information as possible, in particular knowing the context is always
>>>helpful.
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>Martyn
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>

--

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- May 2007 <-- 11 May 2007
Previous message:
Subject: CNS problem: anneal.inp segmentation fault
From: jean jean {- at -} SCIENCE {- dot -} UCT {- dot -} AC {- dot -} ZA
Date: 2007-05-11
Next message:
Subject: Re: Molecular Replacement issues with a WD-40 7-bladed beta propeller
From: Matthew {- dot -} Franklin {- at -} IMCLONE {- dot -} COM Matthew {- dot -} Franklin {- at -} IMCLONE {- dot -} COM
Date: 2007-05-11



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2008 by Quid United Ltd