| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
[ccp4bb] radiation damage |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: radiation damage From: James Holton JMHolton {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV Date: 2009-02-27 As much as I hate to see the CCP4BB used for shameless self-promotion of articles, I did just publish a "Beginner's Guide to Radiation Damage": http://journals.iucr.org/s/issues/2009/02/00/issconts.html My answers to Paul and Michael's posts would be cut-and-pasted from it, so I think it appropriate to refer to it here. I even made the cover! And I hope that (after looking at the cover) all you BBers will forgive me just this once as this was clearly a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Or, at least, I HOPE only once. -James Holton MAD Scientist Paul Swepston wrote: > Michael: > > I attended the CCP4 study weekend in January and there were many discussions > about radiation damage. In your case I wonder if recollecting the data with > a lower over all dosage might get rid of the problem. Either collect with > an attenuated beam or collect the data twice as fast. Someone with more > experience should chime in on this suggestion. > > Paul > > -----Original Message----- > From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of > Michael Weyand > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 6:25 AM > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Subject: [ccp4bb] Refmac5 - high res (1.2A) refinement problem > > Dear experts, > > here is a Refmac question (or at least a refinement question): > > the case: data set was collected at the synchrotron with high intensity or > better high total dose. Data set scales to 1.2A resolution. > Refinement with refmac5_0066, using hydrogens, anisotropic B-factors, > automatic weight (actually 17.9), 235 amino acids, approx. 450 waters, > several ions and buffer/crystallization compounds, a hell of second and > third side chain conformations, present R-fac 12.6, free-R 15.6. > > I think I'm seeing a (partial) backbone break (negative DelFwt density for > backbone atoms at 3.5sig within coot) due to radiation damage in a surface > loop. I see clear missing COOH- and Guanidinium-groups in other parts of the > model!! > > As a consequence, the protein adopts a second (backbone) conformation (clear > positive DelFwt at 4.0sig) for an alpha-helix. But some of the second > conformation residues are not visible. > Summary: > conformation A (aa206-219) ~ 70% occupancy, conformation B (aa212-219) ~ 30% > occupancy, no density (flexibility??? / deletion ???) for aa206-211. > > Refmac always link aa212, conformation B to aa211, conformation A. But, the > CA distance between Calpha atoms of aa212 is / should be about 5A. > > How to address the "non-restraint" between these amino acids, or vice versa > to address a (partial) chain break? > > Furthermore I see "partial" waters at a (second) side chain > conformation/position. Is it also possible to release the restraints for > these waters to atoms of the second side conformation? > > It is really important to do it right, since the second conformation > residues change the active site with a bound ligand. > > Every hint or work-around is highly appreciated. > May be I have to use SHELXL? > > Regards > Michael > > > > CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |