Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

Re: [ccp4bb] Could I improve an inconsecutive experimental map?

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: 14th Annual Structural Biology Symposium, March 27th, 2009
From: "Mark A {- dot -} White" white {- at -} XRAY {- dot -} UTMB {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2009-03-11
Next message:
Subject: Re: long term data backup
From: Paul Swepston paul {- dot -} swepston {- at -} RIGAKU {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-03-11


Subject: Re: Could I improve an inconsecutive experimental map?
From: Fengyun Ni alpharyun {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-03-11

Hi,

I have tried SHARP, but no positive results could be obtained.

Do you have some articles on how to combine the model phase and experimental
phases?
I could only seen the consecutive density in mir 8 to 6 A resolution map, so
I could only locate roughly the position of helix.
After that I use this helix to calculate the structure factor in SFALL.
In SIGMAA, what's the DAMP coefficient should I use?
After combination, do I need to do density modification?
Hope for your help!

Regards,
Alphar


2009/2/21 Charlie Bond

> Hi Alphar,
> A while ago I had success with a poor MIR map by building in a few
> fragments I could identify and then combining phases from this model with
> the MIR phases using SIGMAA (CCP4 program) and then calculating new maps. A
> couple of cycles of this resulted in phases in which I had confidence and I
> was able to build the complete structure. (There's probably a more modern
> way to do this now ...)
> Cheers,
> Charlie
>
>
> Quoting Fengyun Ni :
>
> Thanks, Ezra!
>>
>> I have a native dataset.
>>
>> I'll try what you said, Hope it works in my case.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Alphar
>>
>> 2009/2/21 Ezra Peisach
>>
>> Personally, I would try to build into what you see and then do
>>>
>> phase
>
>> recombination. I had a SeMet crystal in which I could only see
>>>
>> part of a
>
>> sheet and helix after DM... Things were not connected - until I
>>>
>> improved
>
>> the phases with my model. Also - do you have a native dataset?
>>>
>> You do not
>
>> mention it.
>>>
>>> Ezra
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fengyun Ni wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone!
>>>> I have a question on my poor MIR map. Four datasets (two AU and
>>>>
>>> two HG)
>
>> were used for phasing upto 3 A resolution in my case. I could locate
>>>> several
>>>> heavy atom sites for each dataset with occupancy finally refined
>>>>
>>> to about
>
>> 0.3 to 0.4, and with B value refined to about 50 to 80. I did not
>>>>
>>> include
>
>> the anomalous data because once I refine against anomalous data,
>>>>
>>> the
>
>> anomalous occupancy was only about 0.02, and even smaller as
>>>>
>>> 0.004 for some
>
>> sites. I guess the anomalous data are not good enough, so I did not use
>>>> them
>>>> right now (Could I do this? Or must I include them somehow?).
>>>> The FOM I got is about 0.6, the Cullis-R factors were about 0.6
>>>>
>>> for all
>
>> four data sets, and the phasing power was about 2.5 in each dataset.
>>>> After I
>>>> did the density modification, the FOM could increas to about 0.8.
>>>> My problem is that the protein should form a long helix
>>>>
>>> structure as
>
>> indicated by other homology protein, but in the map after density
>>>> modification, the densities are not consecutive though the
>>>>
>>> overall shape
>
>> seemed to be a long helix. The good thing is that some short
>>>>
>>> helix-like
>
>> densities could be observed in the current map, but they are not
>>>>
>>> connected
>
>> to each other.
>>>> Right now, I am totally lost whether I should believe in the
>>>>
>>> mir-map I
>
>> have. Could I improve this map with some other method? Or should
>>>>
>>> I
>
>> re-do the
>>>> phasing?
>>>> BTW, the space group for my crystal is R3 or R32 with a=50, b=50,
>>>>
>>> c=380,
>
>> alpha=90, beta=90 and gamma=120. The c-axis is much longer than
>>>>
>>> a- and
>
>> b-axis, so the reflection data suffered from the anisotroy
>>>>
>>> effect.
>
>> Any suggestion on my phasing problem is welcome.
>>>> --
>>>> Alphar Ni
>>>> Call me alphar~
>>>> :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Fengyun Ni
>> Call me alphar~
>> :)
>>
>>
> --
> Charlie Bond
> Professorial Fellow
> University of Western Australia
> School of Biomedical, Biomolecular and Chemical Sciences
> M310, 35 Stirling Highway
> Crawley WA 6009, Australia
>
>
>


--
Fengyun Ni
Call me alphar~
:)




ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd