| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] Mol Rep in high symmetry spacegroups |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: Mol Rep in high symmetry spacegroups From: Roger Rowlett RRowlett {- at -} MAIL {- dot -} COLGATE {- dot -} EDU Date: 2007-05-12 One major factor that increases the difficulty of finding a satisfactory MR solution (assuming a good search model) is the number of molecules that need to be placed in the ASU. Most programs can typically easily and quickly find a solution for one molecule per ASU. Placing three molecules per ASU can be trying. We've found that either Phaser or EPMR (now Open-EPMR) is able to crack many of the most difficult problems. Both of the programs have the advantage of being very fast and require little fiddling and manual intervention. Cheers, ___________________________________________ Roger S. Rowlett Professor Department of Chemistry Colgate University 13 Oak Drive Hamilton, NY 13346 tel: (315)-228-7245 ofc: (315)-228-7395 fax: (315)-228-7935 email: rrowlett@mail.colgate.edu -----Original Message----- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Jay Thompson Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 6:52 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] Mol Rep in high symmetry spacegroups Hi All, I have a question- kinda general though. I've always heard of stories from people that molecular replacement is often difficult in high symmetry space groups, like R32, cubic, etc... I'm not quite sure I understand why that is the case? Is the molecular replacement difficult because in high symmetry space groups you have so many molecules in the unit cell and therefore the patterson vectors becomes more complicated and therefore more difficult to find a match during cross rotation/translation? If this is the case, I'm wondering if this is still a problem with today's computers and software? Do people have a favorite molecular replacement program they like to use specifically in high symmetry space groups? or are there programs that don't handle high symmetry space groups very well? Do people have a preference between Amore, Phaser, MolRep, epmr, and CNS? Any anecdotes would be appreciated. Thanks in advance! Jay CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |