| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] I/sigma continued |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: I/sigma continued From: Anastassis Perrakis a {- dot -} perrakis {- at -} NKI {- dot -} NL Date: 2009-03-30 On 30 Mar 2009, at 20:30, James Holton wrote: > Frank von Delft wrote: >>> So, what statistic do we want to look at? That depends on what you >>> are trying to do with the data. There is no way for Phil to know >>> this, so it is good that he prints out lots of different >>> statistics. That said, when talking about the data quality >>> requirements for structure solution by MAD/SAD, I suggest looking at >>> I/sigma(I) where: >>> I - merged intensity (proportional to photons) assigned to a >>> reciprocal lattice point (hkl index) >> Does ANY program print this out...? > SCALA calls this "Mn(I/sd)". Sounds like d*TREK calls it "I/sig avg". That is my understanding as well. > > With HKL you compute it "by hand" from the average I and average > "error". hmmm ... from "error" or from "stat."? Should chi^2 be 1 first? > Not sure about XDS... Confusingly, XDS calls that I/SIGMA from what I understand (which as I said before is NOT what SCALA calls I/sigma) Since we only use XDS and (mostly) SCALA in the lab, that is very confusing. I am pretty sure btw that I have myself -wrongly- quoted I/sigma as being in at least 3-4 papers. And I can bet I am not the only one that did so. /sigma and are in my view more deterministic labels and will get safer on their way to "Table 1". Tassos > > > -James Holton > MAD Scientist CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |