Quick navigation: Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |    Advert   |   
 

Re: [ccp4bb] DM and MR

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

   - Protein purification
   - Crystallisation

Special:

   - Programs for crystallography
   - X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

   - CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999
Previous message:
Subject: DM and MR
From: James Stroud xtald00d {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-04-15
Next message:
Subject: Re: DM and MR
From: David Briggs drdavidcbriggs {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-04-15


Subject: Re: DM and MR
From: ANDY DODDS andy {- dot -} dodds6 {- at -} GOOGLEMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-04-15

Hi James,


I usually use DM in teh CCP4 suite to do DM. It gives you options to
do solvent flattening, Histogram matching and NCS averaging.

If you compare the FOM to the DMFOM in the mtz files, you can usually
see and improvement in the score. That is usually all I bother my
arse to look at. Any comments as to what else I should be looking at
generally, would be welcomed.

I am currently working on a difficult structure at 2.9 Angstrom that I
cant get to lower the RFree any more and am stuck at 32% with a R fact
of about 21%. I went back and performed density modification right at
the start, then performed MR and the same refinement as before and saw
absolutely no improvement in refinement statistics at all. They were
identical using the non-DM modified mtz file. I was surprised, but
this may be due more to the fact that I don't fully appreciate what is
going on here.

For the record I performed flattening and matching and tried this and
then both plus NCS (there is NCS in my model) averaging and still
absolutely identical refinement statistics. This is using refmac by
the way TLS + restrained refinement.


Sorry for the thread hijack James, but at least it is related! ;)

cheers

andy

2009/4/15 James Stroud :
> Hello All,
>
> What is the current state of the art with respect to density modification
> after molecular replacement? In other words, what programs are people having
> the best luck with these days?
>
> Thanks in advance for any hints.
>
> James
>




ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd